Lori
In Full Revenge Mode
Posts: 1,201
|
Post by Lori on Nov 3, 2008 19:33:49 GMT -5
Today, in the abandonded theater, Greenlee told Ryan, she thought, Jonathan may be responsible for Emma's disaperance. She basically asked, if Ryan had heard from Jon. Ryan said Jon had been "working overseas". And she said, So you really haven't heard from him? Maybe, the tumor's back...Or, something very close to that.Boy, if they recast "Jonathan" the actor has some very big shoes to fill....And if they do, why does Jon have to be twisted off, again. Probably the most solid relationship Jon had-- was with Emma The mere notion that Jon would (help Annie) take Emma is just plain wrong, imho.... Lori
|
|
|
Post by Amy on Nov 3, 2008 20:00:01 GMT -5
|
|
Lori
In Full Revenge Mode
Posts: 1,201
|
Post by Lori on Nov 3, 2008 21:04:52 GMT -5
Thanks for the karma, Amy! Aside from the reference to Jon today, earlier this afternoon, I was listening to the Pine Valley pod cast (pvp.com) --a sort of weekly recap/roast of AMC. One of the hosts said, there is going to be an unexpected twist, as far as Emma's kidnapping is concerned. I was hoping, if anybody was set to be in cahoots with "Insannie", it would be David Hayward , rather than Jon. It makes me wonder, if the writers just threw in the "Jon" reference as a red herring, or if something will indeed come of it. In past months, Ryan has made references to "my brother", without using the character name. At this point, it's any body's guess.
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Nov 3, 2008 22:58:39 GMT -5
I've seen spoilers on SOC that Di is holding Emma, supposedly for Annie. I'm not sure if Di is in on it or not. I heard about this scene from my mom. As much as it pisses me off that Jonathan's name had to be defiled by that twit Greenlee (sorry not a big fan), I really doubt Jon is coming back in any way. The way I heard it, at least Ryan defended Hockett
|
|
Barbara
In Full Revenge Mode
Posts: 1,527
|
Post by Barbara on Nov 4, 2008 0:34:06 GMT -5
First of all, I like Greenlee, but I was pissed too when, after Ryan said "who hates me that much", her first thought was Jonathan. Had Greenlee not hauled ass out of PV, she would have seen the love and bond between the two brothers, and known this was an absurd accusation. Secondly, how often did we hear "maybe the tumor grew back" in the past. Damn, apparently all Jonathan had to do was make one off move, and they drug up the tumor remark. "Jonathan was caught jaywalking today. Do you think the tumor grew back?". Give it a rest! Most importantly, they had better not recast Jonathan and bring him into this crappy storyline!!!!! By the way, did anyone notice the kidnapper today? It was built like a man. If it was Di, the recast must be a lot bigger than KG. Ok, finished ranting, I feel better.
|
|
Brandon
In Full Revenge Mode
SC's "Guiding Light"
Posts: 2,112
|
Post by Brandon on Nov 4, 2008 1:20:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Nov 4, 2008 1:47:56 GMT -5
AMEN!!! Brandon ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
Lori
In Full Revenge Mode
Posts: 1,201
|
Post by Lori on Nov 4, 2008 3:41:23 GMT -5
"I heard about this scene from my mom. As much as it pisses me off that Jonathan's name had to be defiled by that twit Greenlee (sorry not a big fan), I really doubt Jon is coming back in any way. The way I heard it, at least Ryan defended Hockett" That he did, Beth, that he did! I just thought it was really odd that a 'former' character got such a prominant mention. (Usually, in soaps, that means a character is shortly taken out of mothballs. Literally, my first thought, after Greenlee's comments, was !#$# ...No, they (the writers) can't be serious! But you are correct about "Di", Beth! According to: soaps.com in the "Comings and Goings" page, "Heather McKenzie plays Di Henry beginning November 14! 'Di' was last played by Kelli Giddish." I just had to look up the name of the actress. Lori
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Nov 4, 2008 13:09:26 GMT -5
I still don't get why they're bringing back Di - not Kelli Giddish, and only for 2 days. It seems to me that it could have been done without her. It seems like a waste to me.
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 4, 2008 13:31:54 GMT -5
I don't get it either. And Annie is supposed to let Di take the fall? So weird.
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Nov 4, 2008 19:58:15 GMT -5
I just read an update on SOC. Apparently, Di is an unwitting participant. She had no clue what was going on. But Annie did have an accomplice (Chris, you're not going to like this especially) - Aidan. WTF are the writers doing over there?
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 5, 2008 12:10:08 GMT -5
Actually, I had a feeling it would go this way. THe way they are incorporating Aidan into that storyline made me wonder, and then when Aidan just happened to be at the hotel with the laptop I knew. Plus, it is out of character for him not to inspect the laptop first. And the way he said, "Well it looks like she's doing great..." I thought yep - - they are pinning it on Aidan.
|
|
|
Post by Amy on Nov 5, 2008 20:16:25 GMT -5
Okay, why would Aidan kidnap Emma? And the writers continue to prove daily that they are . Any chance Colin and Aiden can come on over to Guiding Light?
|
|
|
Post by Beth on Nov 5, 2008 20:18:52 GMT -5
The answer's simple, Amy...the writers are idiots ;D Seriously, has there been any good character NOT destroyed in the last year?
|
|
|
Post by Amy on Nov 5, 2008 20:24:26 GMT -5
Beth, I swear they have an ultimate goal of nothing but Zach, Kendall, Greenlee, and Ryan. Why don't they just rename the show 2 Shrews, A Toad, and a Tall Guy.
|
|